Or optional use nfs for glusterfs mounting: 192.168.1. Modify your /etc/fstab in your prefered editor and enter following :ġ92.168.1.1:/images /storage glusterfs defaults,_netdev 0 0 Mount your created Volumes on the glusterfs clients You need to create a new filesystem on your zfs storage pool like this, or use an existing one.Ĭreate your first Volume on glusterfs server gluster volume create images 192.168.1.1:/storage/imagesĬheck your gluster volume status gluster volume status Optional if you want to use glusterfs with nfs: aptitude install nfs-common compatibility issues with Apples new operating system, OS X Yosemite. On all your Clients: aptitude install glusterfs-client OpenZFS on OSX (abbreviated to O3X) is an implementation of ZFS for macOS. On the Server: aptitude install glusterfs-server nfs-common on clients if you want to use glusterfs nfs shares.glusterfs-server package for the server.In my how-to we setup the glusterfs-server on a single instance. If you need a network share for reading small files you should prefer use nfs instead of using glusterfs native client. Let’s say you need a heavy write intense network share in a clustered web environment where multiple web server instances needs to get access to same directory, glusterfs would be a good solution to handle that. So about the limit of the new fs is an LVM like thing under journaled-HFS+/X.Img src: Link GNU Affero General Public License, version 3.ĭid you ever wanted to know how to setup Glusterfs on top of linux zfs or other filesystems? In this article i will describe this in a few easy steps based on my earlier mentioned how to about zfs on linux.įirst of all let me tell you something about where to use glusterfs And those encrypted volumes can be resized (that's not well documented but is supported and is even used by their own Boot Camp Assistant). You can even reboot in the middle of either conversion and it resumes where it left off. One rather cool thing it does is on-the-fly encryption and decryption of an LV. Integrity checking for both data and metadata. It has many advanced features including: Protection against data corruption. It includes the functionality of both traditional file systems and volume manager. The COW stuff was necessary to automagically migrate data from the SSD to the HDD in their so called "fusion drive", so maybe they leverage that for an updated version of Time Machine and could also do it for atomic online OS/software update with an optional later reboot rather than a mandatory one. OpenZFS is an open-source storage platform. Oracle has steadily continued to develop its own proprietary branch of ZFS and Matt Ahrens points out that over 50 of the original OpenSolaris ZFS code has been replaced in OpenZFS with. Ignore my comment in that post as it seems in later versions of Yosemite. They could maybe add a tree for checksums, which would be a good idea for the journal at least but seeing as this hasn't been a priority for even just the journal, the most unencumbered and recent add-on, it seems obviously not a priority. In 2010, Oracle stopped the releasing of source code for new OpenSolaris and ZFS development, effectively forking their closed-source development from the open-. ZFS Day has grown into the two-day OpenZFS Developer Summit and is stronger than ever, a testament to the passion and dedication of the OpenZFS community. I have heard a lot of good things about OpenZFS, which is probably more viable. There's openzfs and Oracle ZFS, so if Apple were to go with ZFS, which one would they pick? The smart choice would be openzfs which almost certainly means they end up licensing Oracle's ZFS at which point it's like, classic Apple - let's try whenever possible to make interoperability either difficult or hilarious.Īpple's Core Storage does have some COW properties, so they could probably do something like linux LVM thin provisioning style snapshots.
0 kommentar(er)
